It is not my intention to judge any thoughtform on its value for people. I mean, thought-forms that I find distracting may be very beneficial and useful for others. So, please read all this as just an expression of free speech. I respect whatever thoughtform you find comfortable. If you disagree simply head for some other website. This is not a platform for discussion.
I discovered during my ride that some thoughtforms were hampering my process or my communication with people. I have found it very difficult to talk to people who were brought up in Christianity. Somehow when people brought up in this fashion start talking about ascension they use terms like Christ the Savior, our holy father, Mother Mary, the Anti-christ, the Chosen people and they refer to the gospels or the revelations or any other biblical book as if the ultimate truth is hidden there.
I have developed serious doubts about the contents of the bible and I have noticed that it often causes serious noise in the communication about ascension-related items. In 2002 I came into contact with a lady from London who had a period in which she channeled some source who tapped into her biblical framework. If you like biblical terminology and channeled material you may take a look at this 'digi-section' which hasn't been updated for three years.
To conclude this, if people continue using biblical terminology I get annoyed and get inclined to end the correspondence. There is too much noise in such conversations from my point of view.
In March 2005 I was contacted by someone who liked the idea to attempt to bridge the christian perspective and the ascension perspective. This led to the formation of a section in which we try to see how some kind of bridge could be built. You can take a look at the progress we have made so far by clicking at the title of that section: Trying to bridge Christian and Ascension Perspectives.