Another recurrent theme within the interdimensional interviews has to do with the way thoughts, emotions and feelings are regarded. I sometimes got the impression that they are wrong altogether. Although I couldn't agree more with the idea that many of us have a rather chaotic way of thinking and feeling, I don't think that it means that thoughts, emotions and feelings are wrong by definition.
Those who frequent this site on a regular basis will know all about the concept of the aligned mental body and the solitary mental body. I think that this distinction is quite useful to better grasp the 'bad rap' thoughts seem to have in the heavens. If you only use your mental body to think these thoughts are bound to get distorted in the end. If you however use the mental body as the interpreter and verbalizer of the signals of the other parts of yourself it has a better chance of producing less harmful thoughts.
When I watched the first Adolf Hitler videos I couldn't help but notice the beauty of his thoughts, at least when he was a little boy. All those in heaven who are so fiercely against thoughts, feelings and emotions should ask themselves how they are able to speak: aren't they still producing thoughts? When they are angry about all these systems on Earth and how bad it all looks, aren't they still emotional? So, I think it would suit them better to make a distinction in various kinds of thoughts, distorted/solitary thoughts or more harmless aligned thoughts. An aligned mental body is sharp in reading the signals of the other bodies (emotional/intuitive/creative) and soul groups: it wouldn't allow emotional themes to turn into big festering wounds.
THE MAYAN CALENDAR AND THE END OF EXISTENCE
I hadn't ever heard of the name Ian Xel Lungold before I encountered his probably presence in one of the portal interviews. You can read a bit more about him at this site. It seems that he was quite into the Mayan Calendar. As you may know this calendar would indicate that the world would end in 2012. According to the portal interview with Ian Lungold it would have originally have been planned to end in 2025 but due to human acts, the end was to come some 13 years earlier, in that famous year 2012.
In the interviews Ian goes on to describe how the Mayans were able to see the universe in front of them and how they were able to fast-forward it into the future and back again, even into the past. He said that he had found in the dimensions that existence would end in 2012, just as the Mayan Calendar describes. This could only be possible because this existence was preprogrammed from the beginning: there was a beginning and there will be and end in about 5 years from now (as I write this article).
This idea of preprogramming often pops in the interviews: not only the universe as a whole, but every single human life would be preprogrammed. Wittgenstein said that his life has been nothing but a preprogrammed one and perhaps that's the reason why he prefers not to think about it any longer. So, how does this recurrent theme of preprogramming fit in with the idea of an ascending planet?
AN ASCENDING OR ENDING WORLD?
This site is dedicated to the exploration of the biological ascension process and not really to the exploration of the end of existence. Perhaps I will eventually discover that there is no such thing as an ascension process but only the gradual disappearance of existence.
Right now I prefer to hold on to the possibility that we are living on a planet that is currently recovering from her long sleep and is heating up because that is the natural consequence of increased awareness. This not only goes for the planet but this would hold for those in humanity who are able to ascend along by altering their thought-forms which would lead to biological adaptations. These biological adaptations would allow for a healthier body which would be able to sustain its existence on an ascending planet. There would be strong associations between the state of the biology and the level of harmlessness.
Why don't I see a reason to change this perspective? There are a few reasons. Ian Xel Lungold said that the whole of existence was preprogrammed: everything was known in the past and everything would work out the way it has, leading to the pulling of the existential plug in 2012. Why do I have my doubts about this perspective? I prefer to think in terms of a learning creation. A creator or Tao that creates a world in order to learn something from it. There would absolutely be no use in having an existence if everything exactly went the way it was programmed.
Creativity would not be possible in such a perspective either. Only fake creativity could exist, in the sense that you would think to have created something new, but in fact it was all preprogrammed. What a sick program it would be if it contained so much pain and frustration leading to a ruthless destruction. A rather sick mind must have been behind the programming of such a creation, or the creator just wanted to gain something out of all these emotions, like Robert Monroe suggests in his book 'Far Journeys': the more emotions the more energy that could be drained from humanity.
DISTORTED THOUGHTFORM IN THE DIMENSIONS?
Philip Dick commented that he experienced that the afterlife was really as distorted as Earth. Perhaps there are a few popular thought-forms in heaven that make up the reality of quite a few people. We will have to find out what these thought-forms are to see if they are 'true' or not. Is Ian Lungold perhaps speaking from a heaven-bubble, in other words, from a private little self-created heaven just like Leonardo de Vinci? Could he be expressing just what he has always believed in during his life?
If he were able to hold on to these concepts of the 'end times' why couldn't Jean-Marie Lustiger, the former Paris Cardinal hold on to his beliefs in a god?
Well, so far I prefer to invest my energy in the concept of a learning ascending world with people waking up to their true origin, instead of a fully programmed dying world without true creativity.
Gibbon,
August 2007
