|
|
Masters and Slaves
|
Recommended Reading:
INTRODUCTION
I truly think we are living in very fascinating times. This page presents a few thoughts dealing with the rapid unveiling of the play between masters and slaves in various terrains: economical, military and political. It is very interesting to note how the ancient indoctrination of the 'slaves' or the masses by the 'masters' or those in power is coming out into the open, for everybody to see. The old techniques seem to be crumbling and there are hardly any alternatives.
THE BIOLOGICAL ASCENSION METAPHOR
The process of ascension implies the gradual increase of awareness. It also means that as the vibration increases certain thought forms that are not in alliance with this new vibration must be removed or they need to be labeled as 'I don't accept them in my reality any more'. Every new step up, introduces new thought forms that are the building blocks of your reality system.
Let's just play with the idea that Earth is indeed increasing her vibration rapidly. Since we are part of our world we as humanity would be faced with an increasing vibration all around us, naturally influencing our bodies. Our bodies would want to adapt to this increasing vibration, but they can only adapt when obstructing thought forms are recognized as such: 'unhealthy' and damaging.
When more people tune into this rise of frequency the impetus to 'kill off', unmask or expose those thougt forms that were the basis of our society for ages will increase as well: it could well be a biological necessity. Some generally held beliefs or memes are simply too 'unhealthy' or harmful to hold: our biology in the long run cannot survive when these thought forms remain inside of our fields. Humanity at large would not be able to ascend without exposing these thought forms. We all need to see through the shrouds that have held us into the lower vibratory bands. As soon as we refuse to accept the reality of certain thought forms, they will simply fade away and make room for a healthier set of thoughts.
ECONOMY AND POWER STRUCTURES
One of the thought forms that are - in my opinion - presently showing up globally is that there is something quite unhealthy in the way companies function and how they see reality. Recently a Dutch company that is quoted on the stock exchange, called 'STORK' got into an interesting situation. The Board of Directors was confronted with shareholders who with a 86% majority decided that it was better for the company to focus solely on the production of airplane components. This would mean that they would have to sell out other divisions of the company, like the division that makes machines for the meat-packing industry.
The Board of Directors never even proposed the plan. It was an initiative from the shareholders, and especially a few groups, called 'hedgefunds' like Centaurus and Paulson. They saw that it would probably mean more profit for them. Not a second did they consider the consequences for all the people that are working in the other divisions. The only thing that seems to drive them forward is the desire to make more profit: companies are just tools to fill your wallet. Companies aren't seen as the source of income for many families, companies in which people have worked often for decades.
Today I heard that Corus, a Dutch-English Steel company has agreed to be sold to an Indian company called Tata. It couldn't guarantee that in the future it would imply the loss of jobs.
There are many examples to be given in which this thought form is reiterated endlessly: "It is OK to disregard the interests of the employees if that means more profit". In the STORK example above no employee was asked anything: the shareholders and the board of directors decide. A small number of rich people receive enormous amounts of money when a take-over occurs and the employees are traded from one company to the other, like slaves from one plantation to the next. Slaves that remain silent out of fear of losing their income.
I sense that there is something happening though. It is becoming so obviously clear that only a small group of people enrich themselves over the backs of many other people, that it cannot last too long. People will notice it and they would have to revolt. I think that many more examples will surface that show the greed of those in power, slowly but surely angering the masses.
AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ: BLURRING OF RIGHT AND WRONG
Another thought form that is surfacing quite clearly these days is "We are the ones doing the right thing: we fight for the right cause: it is OK to kill thousands of people. We are doing the right thing". I am very glad that George Bush got reelected, because he is the best person to speed up the surfacing of the 'unhealthy' thoughtforms that need to be transformed.
Let's name a few thoughtforms that were used in the past but that are losing their credibility rapidly:
It is only a matter of time before this dynamic will resurface again, but this time with the big boss playing the role of the Israelis. Both Afghanistan and Iraq are likely to show that the 'good guys' are responsible for the deaths of many innocent people. I think it will eventually lead to a blurring of who are the right guys and who are the terrorists. Because Iraq and especially Afghanistan are countries that are not as high-tech as Israel, less videos appear on the internet, less journalists are able to describe a neutral story, or pay attention to the other side.
It will become clear that those 'insurgents' and 'terrorists' that are killed daily most of the time are simply citizens or people who are sick and tired of those forces from outside of their country killing their brothers, fathers, sons and ruining their nation. Is it any wonder that more and more reports talk about how much hate has been created by these international troops. How would you react when the Chinese enter the east coast of the United States not only with overwhelming military power but with overwhelming ignorance of the nation as well. How would you respond when your child or father is killed by these Chinese invaders?
Perhaps we will eventually learn that those in power, setting off wars don't really care a lot about the lives of people, they are more interested in their power games, just like those in power in companies hardly seem to care about their employees: their power and greed is far more important. People are just pawns or slaves that are used for their own games.
IRAN, NORTH KOREA AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS
The story just continues. Now Iran and North Korea are portrayed as the bad guys. Like I have suggested in the articles Anger and War and Above International War it might be that the USAI-complex is not willing to look their own shadow in the eye. They see dangerous and evil nations all around them; isn't it time to open up to the possibility that North Korea has a point when it feels threatened by the international politics of the United States. Are not North Korea and the United States dealing with exactly the same thought form?
And what about Iran? Aren't we indoctrinated into believing that Iran is a very bad nation indeed? Perhaps Iran also has the right to make nuclear plants, just like any other nation. Perhaps we need to pay a bit more attention to the thought form that it was rather unfair towards the Palestian people to just put an Israeli stamp on their country, taking away their land. Perhaps we should look more critically towards the righteousness of that post WW-II decision.
Perhaps we also need to take a more critical look to another nuclear fact of history. A nation that is so fearful of other nations developing nuclear weaponry would be wise to reconsider their own use of nuclear weapons in the past. Was it really necessary to kill hundreds of thousands of lives by dropping bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? What does the name of the bomb ('Little Boy') dropped on Hiroshima tell us about the attitude of the 'good guys'? Perhaps the United States must acknowledge their own use of weapons of mass destruction killing numerous people dealing against the Geneva Convention rule that says that one should try to minimize the number of civilian casualties (of course the Geneva Convention didn't exist then). Japanese people were the bad guys, which justified the killing of at least two hundred thousand people.
WEAPON INDUSTRY - PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Many more master-slave dynamics are likely to surface in other industries. I am awaiting the time that the masses want to know what weapons are created to fuel which wars. People might stand up and get angry at their leaders who export weapons without feeling any sense of shame. People might not want to be part of a country that exports weapons of destruction to other nations. Here again the same old tune: the profit that one can gain from selling weapons is far more important than thinking about all the people that are going to be killed because of these weapons. Masters in power don't care about individual people: they are just pawns or slaves.
In a sense the same applies to another big industry, that of the pharmaceutical companies. It won't take too long before the masses will learn about the manipulative ways the pharmaceutical complex uses to make profit by misinforming the masses. Profit is the most important. People are regarded as potential users that can increase profit.
CONCLUSION
This page is about the dynamics between people in power, archetypically called 'masters', and those who are controlled, called the 'slaves'. I think that we are about to witness the 'awakening' of the slaves and the fall of the masters. Perhaps the failure of the 'masters' to control the 'slaves' in Libanon, Iraq and Afghanistan is a sign that despite the overwhelming military powers of the masters, the slaves can no longer be controlled. They will revolt and attack the masters.
Perhaps the time has come for the masters to look within and question their beliefs. To question a number of thought forms that constitute their perspective on reality. Perhaps we are heading towards an era in which the 'slaves' no longer accept the thought forms that are handed down to them by their masters. Perhaps a recent ad like this one by the Republicans will remain as an hilarious example of faded out, heavily distorted thought forms of the past.
Articles referring back to this article
Feel free to respond by clicking on the mailbox below.
Gibbon,
October 2006
|
|